<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Law &#8211; The Model To Practice Dialogues MTPD™</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mtpdculture.org/category/articles/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mtpdculture.org</link>
	<description>Enabling positive social change by facilitating intercultural communication with the Hofstede theories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:09:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">184201045</site>	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anthony Good’s ‘Interpretation, Translation and Confusion in Refugee Status Determination Procedures’</title>
		<link>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/comment-on-anthony-goods-interpretation-translation-and-confusion-in-refugee-status-determination-procedures/</link>
					<comments>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/comment-on-anthony-goods-interpretation-translation-and-confusion-in-refugee-status-determination-procedures/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTPD Culture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 15:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mtpdculture.org/?p=3343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anthony Good&#8217;s paper on interpretation and translation in asylum cases is an excellent contribution to the complex subject matter of cultural diversity in the legal arena. In particular, by presenting an example from the field of refugee law, it discusses a problem that often arises in many other areas of law: What impact does the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Anthony Good&#8217;s paper on interpretation and translation in asylum cases is an excellent contribution to the complex subject matter of cultural diversity in the legal arena. In particular, by presenting an example from the field of refugee law, it discusses a problem that often arises in many other areas of law: What impact does the use of interpreters have on legal processes?</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="http://Comment on Anthony Good’s ‘Interpretation, Translation and Confusion in Refugee Status Determination Procedures’ | Electronic Immigration Network">Click here to read article </a></div>
</div>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/comment-on-anthony-goods-interpretation-translation-and-confusion-in-refugee-status-determination-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3343</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law, Culture and Decolonisation: The Perspectives of Aboriginal Elders on Family Violence in Australia</title>
		<link>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/law-culture-and-decolonisation-the-perspectives-of-aboriginal-elders-on-family-violence-in-australia/</link>
					<comments>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/law-culture-and-decolonisation-the-perspectives-of-aboriginal-elders-on-family-violence-in-australia/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTPD Culture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mtpdculture.org/?p=2452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Abstract Family violence within Aboriginal communities continues to attract considerable scholarly, governmental and public attention in Australia. While rates of victimization are significantly higher than non-Aboriginal rates, Aboriginal women remain suspicious of the ‘carceral feminism’ remedy, arguing that family violence is a legacy of colonialism, systemic racism, and the intergenerational impacts of trauma, requiring its [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Abstract</h2>



<p>Family violence within Aboriginal communities continues to attract considerable scholarly, governmental and public attention in Australia. While rates of victimization are significantly higher than non-Aboriginal rates, Aboriginal women remain suspicious of the ‘carceral feminism’ remedy, arguing that family violence is a legacy of colonialism, systemic racism, and the intergenerational impacts of trauma, requiring its own distinctive suite of responses, ‘uncoupled’ from the dominant feminist narrative of gender inequality, coercive control and patriarchy. We conclude that achieving meaningful reductions in family violence hinges on a decolonising process that shifts power from settler to Aboriginal structures. Aboriginal peoples are increasingly advocating for strengths-based and community-led solutions that are culturally safe, involve Aboriginal justice models, and recognises the salience of Aboriginal Law and Culture. This paper is based on qualitative research in six locations in northern Australia where traditional patterns of Aboriginal Law and Culture are robust. Employing a decolonising methodology, we explore the views of Elders in these communities regarding the existing role of Law and Culture, their criticisms of settler law, and their ambitions for a greater degree of partnership between mainstream and Aboriginal law. The paper advances a number of ideas, based on these discussions, that might facilitate a paradigm shift in theory and practice regarding intervention in family violence.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09646639211046134" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Read Article here:</a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/law-culture-and-decolonisation-the-perspectives-of-aboriginal-elders-on-family-violence-in-australia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2452</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacies of Bandung: Decolonisation and the Politics of Culture</title>
		<link>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/legacies-of-bandung-decolonisation-and-the-politics-of-culture/</link>
					<comments>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/legacies-of-bandung-decolonisation-and-the-politics-of-culture/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTPD Culture]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mtpdculture.org/?p=2449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While postcolonial theorists recognise that the colonial situation did produce some forms of hybridity, anti-colonial theorists have been driven by the urge to decolonise. The politics of decolonisation followed by newly independent nations of the mid-20th century often displayed an uncritical emphasis on modernisation; development, that pursued with technology and tools of scientific progress, was [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>While postcolonial theorists recognise that the colonial situation did produce some forms of hybridity, anti-colonial theorists have been driven by the urge to decolonise. The politics of decolonisation followed by newly independent nations of the mid-20th century often displayed an uncritical emphasis on modernisation; development, that pursued with technology and tools of scientific progress, was a &#8220;catch-up&#8221; exercise with the west. However, with the globalisation of ideas and practices, commensurate with the &#8220;democratisation&#8221; of politics around the 1970s, hitherto marginalised groups also sought a more global, &#8220;deterritorialised&#8221; identity. The period saw the rise of post-structuralist and postmodern theories, that were opposed to the territorial imagination of the nation state. Currently, as humans, objects and practices continue to move seamlessly beyond nation states, this other side of decolonisation &#8211; representing the thoughts of the colonised on a &#8220;dialogue across differences&#8221; &#8211; remains vital but as yet an unfinished project.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link" href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/4417389?seq=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Read Article here:</a></div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://mtpdculture.org/articles/legacies-of-bandung-decolonisation-and-the-politics-of-culture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2449</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
